requestId:684c3e545d1ae5.88073501.
Travel and Gift Studies
———between the system and thinking
Author: Wu Feifei
Source: “Communication Network” WeChat public number
Travel and “Chinese Gift History”
Q
Hello, Teacher Wu Feifei! Very pleased that you can accept our visits. The course “History of Chinese Gifts” you have set up is listed as the general focus course of this period. Based on our understanding, this course focuses on the text of “Three Gifts” (“Zhou Gifts”, “Greetings”, and “Greetings”), combining the main annotations and works in history, and sorting out the academic history from the Western Zhou Dynasty and the late Qing Dynasty. First of all, I would like to ask you to discuss, what exactly is “trade learning”? What are its research scopes?
A:
I have asked about the traditional school that I am short of a long time. It is a part of my studies and at a very large level. I think it should be a very focused part of traditional schooling.
But gift learning cannot be said to be a question for studying the three gifts, but should be a question for building the career methods of Chinese people based on the three gifts. This is at most an abstraction of this subject in my mind, and it is not enough to do the task of doing arts and education.
For example, in traditional learning, the Yi learning developed based on the “Book of Changes” will be considered more philosophical tomorrow, but the research and development of “Age” is more concentrated on political system, so it is more historical. As for gifts, on the one hand, it has a ruling side, because the gifts first relate to the ruling system, but on the other hand, it has a philosophical side.
The “Talent” book
Q
The development history of gifts is very long. The combination of this kind of src and philosophy you mentioned is<a Is the face it has already shown in the development of academic history? 有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有有�
A:
Yes, I think the gift school has thisType orientation. The gift study in the past begins with a discussion related to gifts – this is a complete academic analysis. But in history, these academic discussions are actually inseparable from the practice of the rituals of various dynasties. It can be said that in the fusion of thinking and systemic system, Feng Xue has formed a very realistic academic tradition in the past. The academic evolution of gifts in history not only includes constant thinking about the truth of “gift”, but also includes the changes in the modern system of gifts and legal system.
Q
So, why do you want to start such a course on gifts? What value does this study offer to us tomorrow?
A:
The reason why I chose gifts as the subject of this course is because it is in communication, including content in political system, social system, historical evolution, etc., but also full of double abstract philosophical thinking. Just like the book “Gifts”, it originally explained “Gifts”, but at the same time there are many thoughts about philosophy problems, which can be said to be a resource library for many philosophical thinking. Some of the contents, if you take it out, will make people feel that it is not about the gift-making amount, but about the philosophical facts behind the gift-making. Therefore, the most important feature of the course design of this course is that it hopes to communicate historical and abstract philosophical research, and to erect a bridge between two aspects.
So, I hope that in addition to inheriting the traditional teaching, this course can also become a bridge between system and thinking, breaking the previous academic walls of “philosophy is philosophy, history is history, and system is system”, so that students can treat the evolution of Chinese traditional thinking from a broader perspective and its relationship with our real life. The above is also the idea of finally designing this course.
Q
According to your words, tribute should become the bridge between the system and the thinking. Historically, the academic discussion on tribute is based on the actual foundation of the certain period of time, and the tribute practice is also a part of the political practice within the certain period of time. But for tomorrow’s gift research, the first level of the two aspects of the two aspects of the oriented system and thinking (i.e., system) seems to be no longer possible. In this meaning, what kind of different approach do you think we should discuss the ceremony tomorrow? Without the past system and practical foundation as a basis, the tribute research will be tomorrow – besides the growth of knowledge – to tell us whether there is still something wrong with usOr missing value?
A:
In my opinion, it is not impossible to say that the tribute learning has no real foundation at the moment. We can say that tomorrow’s system and economic basis are very different from traditional society, but in some of the most basic places, the two have their own characteristics.
This need is to be seen from a comparative perspective of Chinese and Western civilizations. The political, legal and social system in the East have their religious foundations behind it. href=”https://twbabyhoney520.org/”>Baobao.com recommendationThese systems were born naturally from religious traditions; China has also had a set of political, legal and social systems since ancient times, but there is no unified religious foundation behind these systems (or perhaps not the religion we know about), and “gift” is the foundation behind these systems, that is, China has established its political, legal and social systems above the gifts.
The current situation in China, in terms of its most basic structure, does not have much change. The current changes in the system are important in the learning of the political and legal system of the East; but in the most basic terms, we cannot copy the religious foundations of the East. This also means that although China currently adopts a reorganization structure similar to the East, the deeper social ethics foundation cannot be used to reorganize the Eastern religious tradition. Therefore, we need to understand the foundation of these more abstract Chinese ethics under the current political and legal system.
From this meaning, China tomorrow still needs such a merit basis, which of course will be very different from the traditional gift system; but I think its basic energy and traditional gift learning are still very relevant. In recent years, the reason why the ceremony has gradually set off a tide is that I think it is related to this in a deeper sense.
-83.jpg!article_800_auto)
Max Werber (1864-1920)
So, the ethics and career styles that are always possessed by China’s original traditions; and through the ethics and essays, do you actually want to pay attention to and understand the ethics styles of China that are different from the Eastern religious traditions?
A:
Yes, this is true. Of course, the development points and side points of disagreement among the country today are different. Some research and discussions can only focus on knowledge growth, perhaps on the cleaning up ancient books, or perhaps on the interest in history. But I think There should be a deeper reason behind the tribute. What I pay more attention to is not the specific manipulation of myself, but some more theoretical issues behind it.
Q
Based on these designs, can you be interested in setting up the content of this course Some threads cross here?
A:
The course time is endless, and I have no way to specifically describe all aspects of the history of the ritual. I have divided the history into several sections: pre-Qin rituals, Han Tang rituals, Song and Ming rituals, and Qing rituals.
The pre-Qin period was a period of classical teachings of tribute. The academic literature was formed under the feudal patriarchal system of the Western Zhou Dynasty. We can also see the thoughts of the hundreds of schools of thought on tribute.
The next is the Han Tang Dynasty’s tribute, which is also the most important block. Since Qin and Han, there was a clear system of emperors, which is also the Zhou Dynasty. The rise of the system of discipline. The rise of Han Dynasty was precisely under the system of Emperor Emperor. Related academic practices were asked to explain and adjust the system of Emperor Emperor Emperor from the beginning of the school, and then give the system of
發佈留言